if we make it one.
This could be a blessing in disguise.
Let's say the present sanction sticks, at least through the end of this year. The MSM prefers to cover conflicts, so this means an opportunity for a lot of continued press coverage for the candidates. The DNC isn't running for president: Clinton, Edwards, and Obama are. They could choose to spend even more time in FL and rail against the DNC's decision and the Repubs scheming; they can all say how they will consider FL delegates as counting, and will only accept the nomination if they are leading by counting FL delegates. Once one says it, the others will follow, so there won't be any "but FL doesn't really count, so actually I'm the front runner" spin of primary results later on in the season - they'd lose credibility.
They'll get lots of good, free publicity for standing up for FL voters, and bring attention to the need for an improved primary schedule. They would also bring more attention to the Republicans attempts to manipulate elections, and the FL Dem legislators' decision to put voting security and their constituents' interests ahead of party. It should also help with Dem voter turnout in the FL primary - "If we all show up, they won't dare ignore our votes, etc.". The DNC could help with additional funds there ...
So out of all that, The DNC will come across as the heavy, the Republicans as gaming elections (again), and Dem FL legislators as standing up for their constituents. Candidates can distance themselves from the DNC a bit in public (good theatre), one candidate will have a clear lead before summer, and the DNC can formally vote to accept FL's delegates during the convention.
It stops being a story well before the general election, but the impetus will still be there to make some equitable changes in the primary schedule for 2012.
This is only a trap if we Democrats make it one - why not come out smelling like a rose instead?