The Story that is constantly spread about the Clinton campaign is that the "Media" has it out for her.
They are mean and nasty and never tell it correctly... (at least Mark Penn's version)
Well I've got news for you the campaign has at least one "news" organization in the bag
Join me on the flip for the Rest Of The Story...
As if the AP's Nedra Pickler fake "Patriotism" smear was not enough they are at it again. This time an AP Story appearing on Yahoo news and of course a ton of other places we get crap like
this
By By MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press Writer
DES MOINES, Iowa - Democrat Barack Obama expanded his fragile lead in delegates over rival Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday,
(emphasis added)
Fragile Lead! What The F^CK,Jeepers freaken creapers !!!!!!1
Lets See is this fragile lead in Iowa Delegates maybe ?
From MSNBC and Chuck Todd
From NBC's Chuck Todd
We have final delegate allocation estimates directly from the Iowa Democratic Party based on today's 99 county conventions. The results, Obama indeed did gain 7 delegates to up his total from 16 (earned on Jan. 3) to 23 now. Clinton upped her total by 1, from 15 to 16 and Edwards dropped 8 delegates to 6. Those six will be up for grabs, perhaps, at the Iowa Democratic Party state convention in June
So Barack leads by 7 delegates that is not fragile
The original delegate count was fragile at Obama 16 and Clinton 15 Edwards 14 <-- That is Fragile but seven!</p>
Mother of mercy help me!
Could it be her National delegate lead ?
Again from Chuck Todd at MSNBC
Pledged Count: Obama leads 1,407-1,252
Superdelegates: Clinton leads 253-217
OVERALL TOTAL: Obama leads 1,624-1,505
That's a 155 Delegate lead in pledged delegates. Nope not fragile either
and a 119 Delegate lead including "Superedelegates" Nope not Fragile either!
BUTT wait there's more....
According to this "story"
Twelve automatic delegates bring the state's total to 57. Obama has been endorsed by four of those and Clinton three, with the remainder uncommitted.
(emphasis added)
The AP is pushing Clintons "Automatic Delegate" BS on us from
TPMElection Central
By Greg Sargent - February 12, 2008
The person I spoke to paraphrases Ickes, who is spearheading Hillary's super-delegate hunt, this way: "We're no longer using the phrase super delegates. It creates a wrong impression. They're called automatic delegates. Because that's what they are."
The worry appears to be that the phrase "super-delegates" implies that "they have super-powers or super influence when they don't," the source says, describing Ickes' thinking. In other words, the phrase suggests that they have greater than average clout and that they have the power to overrule the democratic process, giving it the taint of back-room power politics
I haven't yet seen any evidence that Hillary surrogates are following Ickes' directive, but if we start hearing the new term, we'll now know why.
I guess we now know who Hillary's surrogates are.