Skip to main content

Fox News "Democrat" Howard Wolfson is embracing his new role as "useful idiot and concern troll" wholeheartedly.

Sen. Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic presidential nominee if John Edwards had been caught in his lie about an extramarital affair and forced out of the race last year, insists a top Clinton campaign aide, making a charge that could exacerbate previously existing tensions between the camps of Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama.

"I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," former Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson told

Let's examine this claim, looking at two of the last Iowa polls before the caucuses.

Mason-Dixon for McClatchy-MSNBC. 12/26-28, 2007. MoE 5%

"As you may know, if a candidate fails to get at least 15% at a precinct caucus their supporters can switch and choose to caucus with those backing other candidates or declare themselves uncommitted. If the candidate you are supporting fails to reach the 15% threshold at your precinct ... Which candidate would become your second choice?""

Edwards 32
Obama 20
Clinton 16

Opinion Research Corp for CNN. 12/26-30, 2007. MoE 5%

"If the presidential caucus in Iowa were held today, please tell me which of the following people ... would be your second choice?"

Edwards 36
Obama 25
Clinton 11

Given that Edwards, Obama and Clinton were all essentially tied heading into caucus day, it's telling that Clinton lagged the other two candidates as the fallback choice of Iowa voters. Now there's no polling that shows specifically who Edwards supporters considered as their second choice, so these numbers aren't determinate of anything much other than the fact that Clinton was the least popular second choice. But it seems absurd to suggest that 2/3rds of Edwards voters would've backed Clinton given those numbers above. And if you group Edwards supporters with Obama supporters as anti-establishment "change" voters, then the notion seems even more absurd.

Now note -- the CW during the early primaries was that Edwards helped Obama as long as he stayed in the race. Even I subscribed to this theory -- that if Edwards dropped out, white voters could boost Clinton past Obama. But what happened after Edwards exited the race?

Edwards dropped out January 30. Shortly after, Obama won Super Tuesday, winning Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, and Missouri. Outside of Massachusetts, Clinton, for her part, won only home and regional strongholds (Arkansas and New Jersey) and states with large Latino populations -- Arizona, California, and New Mexico -- which she owned in the primaries (spawning those ridiculous "only Clinton can win the brown vote" stories now proven patently false).

Then, after Super Tuesday, Obama went on to crush Clinton in DC, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Nebraska, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. It wasn't until Texas and Ohio on March 4 that Clinton was able to stop her streak of landslide losses, long after Edwards' memory had faded from the campaign trail.

So if Clinton was truly the second choice of Edwards voters, they sure had a funny way of showing it -- voting for Obama in huge numbers.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Mon Aug 11, 2008 at 02:45 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site