Skip to main content

Deputy A.G. James M. Cole
James M. Cole
Deputy Attorney General James Cole announced at a press conference Wednesday the parameters of the Department of Justice's new clemency initiative for federal prisoners. Only those who have served at least 10 years of their sentences, have not engaged in violence while incarcerated, are not drug kingpins or associated with gangs or cartels will be eligible for clemency.

Given how difficult avoiding violence can be, the criteria for clemency sharply limit how many prisoners could be released. But they could still number in the thousands, many of whom are serving exceedingly long, even life, sentences. All told, there were, as of April 17, 216,265 prisoners held in the federal system.

Most inmates likely to be eligible under the criteria for clemency wound up imprisoned as a consequence of drug laws, the worst being the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. Among other outrageous things, that law assigned a 100:1 sentencing disparity to persons holding crack vs. powder cocaine. Getting caught and convicted for possessing five grams of crack put a person away for a five-year mandatory sentence, the same penalty meted out for getting convicted for having 500 grams of powder cocaine. The disparity had a tremendous negative impact on African Americans who, statistics show, are far more likely to be targeted by law enforcement for drug crimes.

Not just cocaine or other hard drugs, either. For instance, a study last year by the American Civil Liberties Union found that blacks are 3.73 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than whites even though the rate of use is similar for both. But the cocaine law presented the most egregious disparity.

After more than a decade and a half of attempts, that law was superseded with the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. It did away with the mandatory five-year sentence for cocaine possession and reduced the disparity between crack and powder cocaine from 100:1 to 18:1. An improvement, without a doubt, but as long as we're stuck with morally criminal, draconian drug laws there is no excuse for not making the ratio 1:1.

And no excuse for not making fair sentencing retroactive. There are, after all, thousands of people serving sentences under the old law who would have long since been released had they been convicted under the 2010 law. But such a change would take another act of Congress. That for now seems out of the question. The clemency initiative, part of Attorney General Eric Holder's Smart on Crime reform, will go part of the way to make sane what Congress will not.

Below the fold, you can read about Justice's clemency criteria and additional analysis.

Deputy A.G. Cole specified for the press the criteria by which clemency applications will be evaluated:

We are launching this clemency initiative in order to quickly and effectively identify appropriate candidates, candidates who have a clean prison record, do not present a threat to public safety, and were sentenced under out-of-date laws that have since been changed, and are no longer seen as appropriate. While those sentenced prior to the Fair Sentencing Act may be the most obvious candidates, this initiative is not limited to crack offenders. Rather, the initiative is open to candidates who meet six criteria: they must be (1) inmates who are currently serving a federal sentence in prison and, by operation of law, likely would have received a substantially lower sentence if convicted of the same offense today; (2) are non-violent, low-level offenders without significant ties to large-scale criminal organizations, gangs, or cartels; (3) have served at least 10 years of their sentence; (4) do not have a significant criminal history; (5) have demonstrated good conduct in prison; and (6) have no history of violence prior to or during their current term of imprisonment.

Identifying worthy candidates within our large prison population will be no easy feat. A good number of inmates will not meet the six criteria. But we are dedicating significant time and resources to ensure that all potentially eligible petitions are reviewed and then processed quickly to ensure timely justice.

Indeed, many inmates will not meet all six criteria. As noted earlier, avoiding violent conflict in prison for a decade is no small feat. Prisoners who merely defend themselves are not infrequently treated the same way school authorities often treat pupils caught fighting on the playground: They both are punished or the last person to throw a punch is. In elementary school, such behavior will be quickly forgotten if not repeated. But once it gets on your prison record, good luck trying to get it removed.

The Justice Department plans to assign many attorneys to sift through the expected deluge of clemency applications. It would be encouraging to hear in plain, firm language that they won't simply be looking at prison paperwork in their first screening of potentially eligible inmates.

Said Cole:

“For our criminal justice system to be effective, it needs to not only be fair; but it also must be perceived as being fair. Older, stringent punishments that are out of line with sentences imposed under today’s laws erode people’s confidence in our criminal justice system, and I am confident that this initiative will go far to promote the most fundamental of American ideals—equal justice under law.”
The clemency initiative is, without doubt, a move in the right direction toward equal justice. But nobody should mistake it for anything close to a complete fix. It's clear that clemency will not be handed out to thousands of inmates who should never have been imprisoned in the first place. Of course, that could be said of every convict who is doing or has done time for most drug crimes that have not included violence.

We are, however, a long way from the day when sensible drug laws (and other laws) will make our prisons—federal and state—places to hold the far smaller number of people who really need to be locked up.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Apr 23, 2014 at 11:50 AM PDT.

Also republished by Black Kos community and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site