Schultz’s Idiotic Coffee = Health Care Argument

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Tuesday January 29, 2019 · 9:47 PM PST

2019/01/29 · 21:47

Howard Schultz on CBS This Morning, employing a remarkably bad analogical argument to attack the Medicare-for-all plan from Kamala Harris that woulld likely abolish private health insurance (thank God):

That’s not correct, that’s not American. What’s next? What industry are we going to abolish next? The coffee industry?

So, let’s say you are in a high school debate class or a college course on introduction to logic, and the teacher/professor asks you why Howard’s argument is completely fucking stupid. Obvious answer — it’s a blatant false analogy as the coffee industry is entirely dissimilar to health care. Basic health care is a fundamental right, coffee is not. Basic health care is a highly-specialized, highly-skilled service that is difficult to procure and disproportionately expensive. Without it, you may suffer terribly and die early. Coffee is a cheap, ubiquitous commodity that has almost no relevance to overall quality of life on an individual or collective basis.

What are true analogical items for health care? How about education, environmental safety, worker safety, food safety, travel safety, rights to judicial remedies, rights to participate in government, etc. Funny fucking thing there Howard — all of those items are completely or partially within the control of government and all are totally fucking American.

Just an idiotic argument from Howard. Yet, it went pretty much unchallenged when uttered. And of course, Faux News is running with it as one of its principle attacks against Harris for the day.

Good grief people, we are smarter than this.

Someone Needs to Tell Lindsey Graham to STFU!

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday November 09, 2018 · 12:41 PM PST

2018/11/09 · 12:41

Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) shouts while questioning Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. - University professor Christine Blasey Ford, 51, told a tense Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that could make or break Kavanaugh's nomination she was "100 percent" certain he was the assailant and it was "absolutely not" a case of mistaken identify. (Photo by Andrew Harnik / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read ANDREW HARNIK/AFP/Getty Images)

Despicable vaudeville actor Lindsey Graham wants to invalidate votes that were legitimately cast and undermine democracy:

Whether it was setting aside the presumption of innocence for Judge Kavanaugh or ignoring Florida election laws, liberals in Washington and Florida are seeking an outcome.

The Law be Damned!
Ã¢ÂÂ Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) November 9, 2018

Why does this lying asshole lie through his asshole like this? Because he knows the GOP loses if the votes are counted. And he thinks saying stupid shit like this enhances his standing among the crazed GOP base.

The GOP does everything in their power to make it more difficult for minorities and urbanites to vote, make it more difficult for urban communities to collect and tabulate votes, and make it more difficult to recover and/or validate legitimately cast votes as part of the election certification process.

Simply put, Lindsey Graham doesn’t like democracy. That’ a remarkably strange and dangerous position to take as a U.S. Senator. I guess this shameless dirt-bag has lost mind now that he can no longer serve as John McCain’s obsequious minion.

Someone needs to tell Lindsey Graham to STFU!

Ball is in Play; Efforts to Divide Dems

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday July 01, 2018 · 10:49 PM PDT

2018/07/01 · 22:49

The Trump, GOP and Russian playbook will be exactly the same in 2018 as it was in 2016 — (i) stir up the racist/homophobic/misogynistic/xenophobic GOP base and, more importantly, (ii) use “purity-plays” and wedge issues to suppress and divide the Democratic base. Item (i) is, for the most part, out of our control. We fully decide on item (ii).

As for item (ii), just looking at what has been written in the past week, that ball is now fully in play for 2018:

Here the Washington Post discusses how liberal outrage could be an obstacle for Democrats in the midterms
Here, here and here the NYT, Politico and NBC News go hyperbolic in contriving the notion that Democrats are in disarray
Here the NYT warns of a coming… dare we say, “rebellion” within the Democratic Party
Here Axios reports on the existential danger of Democrats calling for the abolition of ICE
Here the RNC warns of ‘unhinged liberals’ threatening Democrat’s electoral chances
Here the Washington Post conjures up a ‘looming crisis’ facing Democrats
etc.

The ball is in play. It’s fully in play. This ploy is so fucking obvious and pathetic, but it can't be dismissed because it’s worked well for them in the past.

We decide now. Do we take the bait? Do we do exactly what Trump and the GOP want us to do and believe we will do, or do we turn the tables on them and show unprecendted Democratic discipline?

From now on (not just 2018), the sole focus of all political activity from the Democratic Party and all progressive organizations should be to educate progressive voters on the existential importance of voting with discipline in every federal, state and local election in every election cycle. Nothing is more important. Unless and until progressive voters understand this, the nightmare we are living gets much worse.

I Told You So

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday June 29, 2018 · 8:15 AM PDT

2018/06/29 · 08:15

I’ve been in a near catatonic stupor since Wednesday. I can’t stop thinking of the hundreds of conversations I had canvassing outside of Pittsburgh in 2016. Some were invigorating. Some were difficult to judge. And some were insanely frustrating.

One house was a group of late 20s hipsters. All white and what I would classify as middle class, although some seemed to come from wealth (cars of the affluent in driveway). All articulate and presented well. All had voted for Obama in 2012. They said they were progressives. I felt good. My eventual introduction as an agent for the Clinton campaign was met with derision and scorn. They said she was a corporatist. They said she had cheated in the primary. They said she couldn’t be trusted with emails. They specifically said there was little difference between her and Trump. None were voting for Clinton.

It happened again and again. About every 15-20 houses or so. A self-professed progressive explaining to me, in completely nonsensical fashion, why a protest-vote or no-vote was in order this election.

And they weren’t just young hipsters. Lots in their 50s/60s. Completely oblivious to the fact that this election had truly historical ramifications. In that regard, one encounter was with an older male gay couple in Shady Side who fully embraced the notion that Clinton was no different than Trump. When I asked if they were concerned about a Trump Supreme Court overturning Obergefell, they replied, “I’ll guess we’ll learn our lesson if that happens.” I still don’t know what that meant.

Reasoning with these these folks was not a possibility. The had been fully co-opted by the GOP and Russia, and for sure the faux-outrage and misinformation from the now suspended Sanders campaign lingered in the psyche of many. It was a lost cause. I had never — not even close — seen anything like it in my many years of canvassing. A small but significant portion of our strident base was now intellectually disengaged, emotionally hijacked and programmed to sabotage our own candidate.

My dominant thought when I left PA was this — is this really going to happen and what the hell is going to happen to SCOTUS. I told my wife. I told her I was scared for our kids. I had that empty and sad feeling that occurs when your sense of right and wrong has been entirely upended. She thought I was being a bit hysterical, and told me not to worry. A poll came out a few days later showing Clinton safe in PA. I went on with life.

I got that same empty and sad feeling on election night. Obviously. Took a few months off after that and then got back into the game. I got the feeling again this past Wednesday, but it was even worse than on election night. I went home from work. I sat with my wife. I looked at her and said, “I told you so.” She replied, “yeah, I know.”

It's the Assault Weapons Ban Stupid

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday February 16, 2018 · 9:08 AM PST

2018/02/16 · 09:08

H&K AR15 Assault Rifle, via wikipidia / wikimedia

The Russian Bots are feverishly using divisive memes (school prayer, lack of discipline, liberal values, etc.) to deflect real consideration of what’s behind the epidemic of mass shootings in the U.S. Let’s not forget that the expiration of the federal assault weapons ban is the direct and proximate cause of the rapid increase in mass shootings in the U.S. over the past 14 years.

The assault weapons ban, effective between 1995 — 2004, covered the Colt AR-15 and derivative assault weapons. Here is an incomplete list - just a sampling - of mass shootings in the U.S. since the expiration of the ban that featured an AR-15 styled assault weapon:

Oct. 7, 2007: Tyler Peterson, 20, used an AR-15 to kill six and injure one at an apartment in Crandon, Wis.
June 20, 2012: James Eagan Holmes, 24, used an AR-15-style .223-caliber Smith and Wesson rifle with a 100-round magazine, a 12-gauge Remington shotgun and two .40-caliber Glock semi-automatic pistols to kill 12 and injure 58 at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo.
Dec. 14, 2012: Adam Lanza, 20, used an AR-15-style rifle, a .223-caliber Bushmaster, to kill 27 people in Newtown, Conn.
June 7, 2013: John Zawahri, 23, used an AR-15-style .223-caliber rifle and a .44-caliber Remington revolver to kill five and injure three at a home in Santa Monica, Calif.
March 19, 2015: Justin Fowler, 24, used an AR-15 to kill one and injure two on a street in Little Water, N.M.
May 31, 2015: Jeffrey Scott Pitts, 36, used an AR-15 and .45-caliber handgun to kill two and injure two at a store in Conyers, Ga.
Oct. 31, 2015: Noah Jacob Harpham, 33, used an AR-15, a .357-caliber revolver and a 9mm semi-automatic pistol to kill three on a street in Colorado Springs, Colo.
Dec. 2, 2015: Syed Rizwyan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, 28 and 27, used two AR-15-style, .223-caliber Remington rifles and two 9 mm handguns to kill 14 and injure 21 at his workplace in San Bernardino, Calif.
June 12, 2016: Omar Mateen, 29, used an AR-15 style rifle (Sig Sauer MCX), and a 9mm Glock semi-automatic pistol to kill 49 people and injure 50 at an Orlando nightclub.
Oct. 1, 2017: Stephen Paddock, 64, used a stockpile of guns including an AR-15 to kill 58 people and injure hundreds at a music festival in Las Vegas.
Nov. 5, 2017: Devin Kelley, 26, used an AR-15 style Ruger rifle to kill 26 people at a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas.
Feb. 14, 2018: Police say Nikolas Cruz, 19, used an AR-15-style rifle to kill at least 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

Nearly all mass shootings in the U.S. since the expiration of the ban involved an AR-15 or similar assault weapon. I could find only one mass shooting prior to the ban that involved an AR-15 (Feb. 24, 1984: Tyrone Mitchell, 28, used an AR-15, a Stoeger 12-gauge shotgun and a Winchester 12-gauge shotgun to kill two and wound 12 at 49th Street Elementary School in Los Angeles).

There were less than 1,000,000 assault weapons in private ownership in the U.S. when Clinton took office in 1992, and many of these weapons were in the hands of Veterans with a nostalgic desire to have the civilian equivalent of the M-16. That number increases to about 1,200,000 right before the ban is effective in 1995. The ban expires in September 2004. Assault weapons ownership absolutely skyrockets during the Obama administration (2008 -2016) along with the rise of racist anti-government sentiment and the loony Tea-Party militias. It’s estimated that there are between 10,000,000 - 11,000,000 assault weapons currently circulating in the U.S. They are now ubiquitous.

Here is a graph of mass shooting deaths in the U.S. during and after the federal assault weapons ban (on track to exceed 400 in 2018):

The data is clear (that blip in 1999 is Columbine which did not involve an AR-15). The assault weapons ban was effective in the context of mass shootings. It saved lives.

We are living an NRA-imposed nightmare right now. Kids are dying in scores in horrific incidents which traumatize and desensitize the collective conscious (and subconscious for that matter) of our nation. It’s a hell of a lot to sacrifice all so that Colt and other weapons manufacturers can make a massive profit on these weapons, and the most extreme fringe of the right-wing can run around in the woods on the weekends pretending to save the country from the evil, non-white federal government.

Open Note to Eagles Players; PLEASE DO NOT CITE POLITICS IN YOUR REFUSAL TO ATTEND WH

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Monday February 05, 2018 · 8:38 AM PST

2018/02/05 · 08:38

To all Eagles players,

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE do not cite policy differences or general politics to justify your refusal to go to the WH. It’s a matter of human decency, not politics. You should refuse to go to the WH based on your unwillingness to participate in the normalization of a dangerous man who lacks basic human decency. You lose your standing, and you certainly lose your message, to the extent you make it an argument on general politics and policy issues.

Trump is a racist, homophobic, xenophobic and misogynistic serial sexual-assaulter with an embarrassing man-crush on a homicidal dictator who has hostile intentions towards the U.S. This a man who disgustingly equates Nazis with those who protest against racism and intolerance. This is man who has a history of making virulently racist comments and supporting racist organizations. This is man who lies incessantly without regard to lives impacted and people hurt. This is a man who brags about “grabbing pussies”. This is a man who is willing to attack Gold Star families because of their faith and ethnic heritage. This is a man who has extramarital affairs with porn stars while his wife is at home with the couple’s newly born son, and then pays one of the porn stars a sizeable chunk of money to keep quiet. This is a man who gleefully sexualizes his own daughter on nationally syndicated smut radio programs. This man is a disgusting pig.

You should refuse to participate in the normalization of a disgusting pig.

It’s a matter of human decency, not politics.

Sincerely,

JCPOK

To Kos Community — Please feel free to add to the open note with additional reasons/examples of why Trump is a disgusting pig. Maybe our new nickname for Trump should be “Pig Trump”.

The New Evil Brand of GOP Economics Seen in One Simple CBO Chart

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Thursday November 30, 2017 · 8:36 AM PST

2017/11/30 · 08:36

Below is analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, now run by a Republican appointee who believes in dynamic scoring (i.e., conservative economics imbued with magic), indicating the net impact of the Senate’s proposed tax bill on various groups of earners. This is not a joke. This is the Republican-led CBO’s official projected impact of the bill.

Just look at this. The chart plainly shows that folks earning less than $50K/year will receive significantly less in government services to facilitate massive tax cuts for those earning above $500K/year. Again, this is not a joke. These are the official estimates from the Republican-led CBO. Not shown in this chart are the potential financial losses for uncovered medical expenses for the 13,000,000 million people, mostly middle and low-income individuals, who will lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Also not shown is the economic impact of significant new deficit spending required for the bill — inflation and higher interest rates, both of which typically hurt lower earners and help higher earners.

Yet, this bill proceeds. It proceeds exclusively with Republican support, despite the fact that it will severely undermine the already precarious economic standing of tens of millions of middle and low-income individuals so that a small group of ultra-wealthy individuals get massive tax cuts. This is bizarre. It’s perverse public policy meant to force million of Americans into a state of permanent financial destitution.

What the fuck is the GOP thinking? Is it pure intellectual detachment? Are they living some Ayn-Randian fantasy where the needs of the least fortunate among us simply disappear if society spurns them?

Or maybe this is another attempt to rebrand the same failed economic policies centered around tax cuts for the rich. First there was Ricardian equivalence, but that was much too academic for public consumption and what’s with all those French negative implications anyway. Then we were sold supply-side economics but that supply-curve magic never materializes and all we got were massive deficits. Then we got trickle-down economics, with the trickle coming in the form of a deluge increase in income inequality. And most recently we had the Grover Norquist contrived starve-the-beast economics, a concept that has actually been tested and shown to be unbelievably disastrous in Kansas and here in Oklahoma.

So, how do they brand this effort? Maybe “Fuck-the-Poor-Because-We-Don’t-Give-a-Shit-About-You-or-Your-Kids-and-All-We-Want-Are-Tax-Cuts-for-the-Rich Economics”? Kind of long and severely hyphenated for a brand but nonetheless accurate.

How Democracy Dies? We let it.

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Monday November 27, 2017 · 7:12 AM PST

2017/11/27 · 07:12

It pains me to read diary after diary and comment after comment from folks here predicting the impending doom of our democracy with a sense of awe and surprise. Yes, certain aspects of the doom are very real and I understand we have to do our best to motivate the resistance, but we knew this was going to happen. It's absolutely no surprise. We knew this entire crazed Trump agenda was going to happen and we let it happen.

Democracy dies in a two-party system when voters from the party representing the minority vote with discipline in every federal, state and local election while voters from the party representing the majority don’t and thereby cede the political stage to the minority.

None of of the Obamacare sabotage, none of the RWNJ judges, none of the tax cuts for the wealthy, none of the anti-immigration executive orders, etc. happen if progressives in the U.S. vote with discipline. None of it.

We just had an election which pitted the most progressive major-party nominee for President in modern history (it’s not even close) against a racist, fascist, xenophobic, narcissistic, homophobic, sexually-assaulting twit who, if elected, represented an existential threat to our democracy. The election was unprecedented in this respect. Yet, in an election in which the continued existence of our democracy was at stake, hundreds of thousands of progressives protest-voted or refused to vote at all based on the ludicrous notion that our candidate was somehow rendered equivalent to the racist, fascist, xenophobic, narcissistic, homophobic, sexually-assaulting twit who, if elected, represented an existential threat to our democracy, because our candidate was not progressively pure. These purists easily swung the election in PA, WI and MI, with tens of thousands of progressive voters in each of those states either protest voting or not voting at all.

None of what is happening is a surprise. We all knew the consequences of losing in 2016. It’s time we quit acting like victims. We are the cause of this. And it will only get worse — much, much worse — unless and until we realize that the path to power rests with voting with discipline in every federal, state and local election in every election cycle. It’s the only solution. It’s the only way out of this mess.

THE SINGLE GREATEST ISSUE FACING THE WORLD —AND NOT JUST THIS GREAT NATION — IS THE FACT THAT PROGRESSIVES IN THE U.S. ARE NOT DISCIPLINED VOTERS AND THEREBY CEDE POWER TO THE UNHINGED GOP. IT IS THE ISSUE THAT SUPERSEDES ALL ISSUES.

THE ONLY WAY TO STOP THE GUN INSANITY

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday November 05, 2017 · 1:37 PM PST

2017/11/05 · 13:37

There is only one way to stop the gun insanity infecting this great nation — progressives and all other Democrats must vote with discipline in every federal, state and local election in every election cycle.

That’s the only way. That’s it. Nothing else will work.

You are a complete and utter fool if you think otherwise. This issue, more than any other, illustrates the truly horrific ramifications of our erratic voting performance, especially in midterms and local elections, over the past 35 years. We have allowed a distinct minority segment of the voting populace to impose their extreme and dangerous views on us because they vote with discipline and we don’t. It’s that fucking simple.

We are delusional if we think we can somehow alter or transform the views of the GOP and the NRA on this issue. They are locked in. They have their hoard of intransigent voters who vote in every fucking election for the GOP candidate regardless of who the candidate is or whatever in the hell is going on with GOP intraparty politics. They know the path to power lies in their collective commitment to vote with discipline. And they do it.

We are the majority. Yet, we have rendered ourselves powerless on this issue and so many others because we fail to realize what the GOP realized some 30 years ago. I firmly believe, based on my many years of canvassing and working on the ground for progressive and moderate Democratic candidates, that this is a cultural issue. It has little, if anything, to do with party leadership or quality of candidates. There are large segments of our base who simply believe that voting in midterms and state/local elections is meaningless and inconsequential.

We need billboards, radio spots, TV ads and even fucking flyers in every major Democratic stronghold which says… “IF WE FAIL TO VOTE, THIS IS WHAT WE GET… “ and there should follow a picture of Trump, or Roy Moore with his stupid fucking pistol, Jeff Sessions with his crazed KKK-eyes, or an automatic assault rife, etc.

Folks need to know that voting is a sacred act. We can’t fuck around with non-voting or protest-voting. The other Party is becoming increasingly more extreme and more detached from reality. That Party is dominated by misogynists, xenophobes, racists, homophones and narcissistic anti-intellectual capitalists. That Party represents a clear and present danger to our way of life and possibly our very existence. Our Party, while certainly not perfect, believes in science, believes in fact, believes in equality, believes in economic opportunity for all, believes in civil rights, etc. In our two-party system, we absolutely promote and further the interests of the other Party when we fail to vote with discipline. That’s a fact whether you like it or not. We don’t have that luxury.

Vote people. Vote with discipline.

When Purists Prevail; Definitive Analysis that Sanders Voters Elected Trump

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Thursday August 24, 2017 · 10:05 AM PDT

2017/08/24 · 10:05

The raw data has been floating around for quite some time now, and I think anyone who had a peek at it has been bracing for the worst. Well, the definitive analysis has now been delivered. It’s positively revolting. Without a doubt, the purists among us elected Trump.

The Guide to the 21016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey, authored by statisticians from Harvard, UMass Amherst and YouGov and based on data assembled by researchers from 60 participating universities, was released yesterday. It concludes that, on a national basis, those who voted for Sanders in the primary voted in the general election as follows:

That’s not an image error. 12% voted for Trump. Another 11% voted third-party or didn’t vote at all.

In the critical states, 16% of those who voted for Sanders in the PA primary voted for Trump in the general. In WI and MI, it was 9% and 8% respectively. To put this into raw numbers, Sanders-to-Trump voters ultimately gave Trump the margin he needed to win in each of those states:

In Wisconsin, roughly 51K Sanders voters backed Trump in a state he won by just 22K votes.
In Michigan, roughly 47K Sanders voters backed Trump in a state he won by just 10K votes.
In Pennsylvania, roughly 116K Sanders voters backed Trump in a state he won by just 44K votes.

Keep in mind that a Sanders-to-Trump vote is doubly painful because it likely represents a net +2 for Trump (absolute +1 vote for Trump and likely -1 vote for Clinton). Also, the above analysis in these three states is before you even get to Sanders voters who protest voted or didn't vote at all.

And here’s an extra kick in the balls — these folks were not Rs and were generally ideologically progressive:

They fucking did it out of purist spite, apparently thinking they had the luxury to do so (i.e., Clinton would win anyway) or they were somehow rejecting the status quo. We now are enduring a national nightmare which will deleteriously impact the political and socioeconomic trajectory of this nation for decades to come.

Elections have consequences. Until progressives understand that and vote with discipline in every federal, state and local election, we will be forced to endure the absolute insanity you see now. We can only be a political force when we vote en masse all the time, create political momentum and bring the rest of America along with us.

Lest We Forget, Republicans are Disciplined; 87% Approval of Trump's Response to Charlottesville

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday August 18, 2017 · 7:37 AM PDT

2017/08/18 · 07:37

If you thought the upcoming midterm was going to be a cakewalk, think again. Our pussy-grabbing, internationally-despised, trusted-less-than-Putin, treasonous President still gets 87% approval from Republicans on his Nazis-are-nice-people response to Charlottesville. That’s right, 87%.

GOP voters don’t care about Trump’s racism, or his misogyny, or his xenophobia, or his homophobia, or his total lack of character and ethics. They will still vote with discipline for Trump and every other GOP candidate in every federal, state and local election — including the upcoming mid-term. That’s how they’ve accumulated nearly unlimited power over the past 30 years. It works. It works beautifully. It’s a true political movement. Until we learn the same, we will be powerless.

Elections have consequences. We do not have the luxury to sit out an election, or lodge some asinine protest vote. We don't have that luxury because we live in a two-party system and the other side votes with discipline in every federal, state and local election.

So, bask in the glory of a silent majority all you want. Write ad infinitum on this site and in other progressive outlets establishing to a metaphysical certainty that Trump is a tremendously flawed and horrible human being. In terms of real consequences for real people, it doesn't mean shit! The horrible, nightmarish reality we are now experiencing will continue to unfold and worsen unless and until we finally come together as a true political movement and vote with discipline in every federal, state and local election.

The single greatest issue facing the world —and not just this great Nation — is the fact that progressives in the U.S. are not disciplined voters and thereby cede power to the unhinged GOP. It is the issue that supersedes all issues.

Good News! Reuters/IPSOS O 47 R 46

JCPOK

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday October 26, 2012 · 10:23 AM PDT

2012/10/26 · 10:23

Here is link.

That's +2 movement for Obama from yesterday - O +1 and R -1.

I have yet to see IDB/TIPP today, but this means WaPo and Reuters moved in Obama's direction today.

So, let's chill.

Newer
Older

RSS