ELECTORAL COLLEGE
CO
ME
NV
VA
PA
MI
MN
NH
AZ
FL
NC
ME-02
NE-02
WI
GA
IA
OH
TX
NE-01
GOVERNORS
MT-GOV
NH-GOV
MO-GOV
VT-GOV
SENATE
MN-SEN
NH-SEN
VA-SEN
CO-SEN
MI-SEN
AZ-SEN
ME-SEN
NC-SEN
GA-SEN A
GA-SEN-B
IA-SEN
AK-SEN
AL-SEN
KS-SEN
MT-SEN
TX-SEN
HOUSE
AZ-2
CA-7
CA-21
CA-45
CA-49
CO-6
CT-5
FL-7
FL-27
FL-13
IL-6
MN-3
NH-1
NJ-5
NV-4
OR-4
PA-6
PA-17
PA-8
VA-10
WI-3
AZ-1
CA-10
CA-25
CA-39
CA-48
FL-26
GA-6
IA-1
IA-2
IA-3
IL-14
KS-3
MI-11
MI-8
MN-2
NJ-7
NJ-11
NV-3
NY-19
PA-7
TX-7
TX-23
TX-32
VA-2
WA-8
AZ-6
GA-7
ME-2
MO-2 (Tilt R)
NE-2
NJ-2 (Tilt R)
NJ-3 (Tilt D)
NM-2
NY-11 (Tilt D)
NY-22
OK-5
PA-1
SC-1
TX-24
UT-4 (Tilt D)
VA-7
IL-13
MI-3
MI-6
MN-7
NY-2
NY-24
PA-10
TX-10
TX-21
TX-22
WA-3
AK-AL
CA-22
CA-50
CO-3
FL-15
FL-16
FL-18
FL-25
IA-4
IN-5
IL-12
KS-2
KY-6
MI-7
MN-1
MN-8
MT-AL
NC-8
NY-1
NY-21
NY-27
OH-1
OH-10
OH-12
OH-14
PA-16
TX-2
TX-31
VA-5
WI-1
WI-6
WI-7
WI-8
Likely D to Lean D:
MI-SEN: I’m now more or less of the opinion that this race will track pretty close to the Presidential race, so it didn’t really make much sense to keep it at Likely R.
Lean D to Tossup / Tilt R:
NJ-2: Van Drew’s party switch is certainly not great for our prospect of winning this seat, but it’s still only R+2, and we can and should vigorously contest it.
Lean R to Likely R:
CA-50: Mostly reflecting Hunter being gone.